Discussion about this post

User's avatar
trifle's avatar

It's quite clear to me that the film is instrumental for Caviezel to position himself politically.

I'm surprised you didn't comment on the scene where Ballard is asked why he wants to rescue the children. In what could have been an interesting moment of self-reflection, Ballard answers with the mantra: "God's children are not for sale". Of course, Caviezel intends this to be the mantra all his "followers" use to justify their rage (which may extend to their otherwise unrelated political activities), but it reveals an emotional guardedness that is everywhere in the film. Ballard, when he is not grinning for pedo-punishment, is emotionless. Even when he cried, he was stone-faced. To me, this disconnection from one's emotions to supplant it with an idea of Godly righteousness is incredibly unsettling.

Expand full comment
Zero State Reflex's avatar

This film, (I haven't seen it, though have listened to others comment about it) seems like a hero fetish. Push the darkness into unknown lands and I don't have to feel bad about it.

I think your analysis is right. Just look at the recent article by the WSJ on the underage sex networks on instagram. We have sex trafficking in our own backyard as the data suggests and not one mention during the hype of this film. Meta will do fuck all about it.

Social media companies are the traffic lanes already being used. Imagine a film based on that, maybe we'd feel so gross we'd actually do something.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts